Fáilte chuig gaa.ie - suíomh oifigiúil CLG

News

CHC Hearing: March 2023

A general view of Croke Park. Photo by Piaras Ó Mídheach/Sportsfile

A general view of Croke Park. Photo by Piaras Ó Mídheach/Sportsfile

Hearing 1 of 2: Cillian Ó Maolábhail | Killian Lavelle

Defending Party: Cillian Ó Maolábhail| Muineacháin

Competition: Allianz Football League Roinn 1

Fixture: Muineacháin vs Tír Eoghain

Venue: Clones

Data: 19ú Marta 2023

An Lár Choiste Cheannais na gComortaisí took Disciplinary Action against Cillian Ó Maolábhail, alleging a breach of Riail 7.2 (b), Category III, T.O. 2022, that is to say, “Kicking with minimal force”.

Cillian Ó Maolábhail requested a Hearing which took place on 23ú Márta 2023. An Lár Choiste Éisteachta (Central Hearings Committee) found the Infraction not proven and so no penalty is imposed.

Hearing 2 of 2: Dáithí Mac Gearailt | David Fitzgerald

Defending Party: Dáithí Mac Gearailt| An Clár

Competition: Allianz Hurling League Roinn 1

Fixture: An Clár vs Corcaigh

Venue: Cusack Park, Ennis

Data: 19ú Marta 2023

An Lár Choiste Cheannais na gComortaisí took Disciplinary Action against Dáithí Mac Gearailt, alleging a breach of Riail 7.2 (b), Category III, T.O. 2022, that is to say, “Striking with hand, with minimal force”.

Dáithí Mac Gearailt requested a Hearing which took place on 23ú Márta 2023. An Lár Choiste Éisteachta (Central Hearings Committee) found the Infraction proven and imposed the following penalty:

One match suspension in the same code and at the same level, applicable to the next game in the combination of Allianz League/Inter-County Senior Championship, even if that game occurs in the following year.

Dáithí Mac Gearailt has the option of appealing against the decision of An Lár Choiste Éisteachta to the An Lár Choiste Achomhairc. 

Disciplinary Process Explained

Charge

1. Disciplinary Action is commenced by the Central Competitions Control Committee

2. The Central Competitions Control Committee prepares a charge and notifies the Defending Party of the alleged infraction. (It also offers him the option of accepting a proposed penalty, without a Hearing).

 Hearing (Hearings Committee)

3. The Defending Party can request a Hearing rather than accept the charge (and the proposed penalty).

4. The Hearings Committee (decision makers) decide whether the alleged infraction is proven. If it is proven, they impose a penalty.

Appeal (Appeals Committee)

5. If the Defending Party is not willing to accept the decision of the Hearings Committee and any penalty imposed, then he can appeal to the Appeals Committee.

6. The Appeal is heard by the Appeals Committee. The Appeal can only be successful where there has been a clear infringement or misapplication of Rule by the Hearings Committee or the Appellants right to a fair hearing has otherwise been compromised to such extent that a clear injustice has occurred. All avenues of appeal are now exhausted.

Arbitration (Disputes Resolution Authority)

7. If the Defending Party is still not willing to accept the imposed penalty, a request for Arbitration may be lodged with the DRA (Disputes Resolution Authority), an external Independent Body whose decisions are legally binding.

===